20110221

HO IX

This is some info on one of my favourite airplanes, the first "stealth" airplane, from 1944. The sources are various, and I can not guarantee the rightness of it all, but here is the story anyway:

Horten IXor the
Gota go 229


In 1943, Richsmarsalk Goering held a speech to representatives of the Aircraft Industry and announced that a contract would be issued to the manufacturers who could build an aircraft that could carry 1000 kg of bombs 1000 km at a speed of 1,000 km/h.
Fighter divisions also requested that the plane should be armed with 30 mm cannons.

Horten, led by the brothers Reimar and Walter, began construction without obtaining any contract. Their design was a shell structure of wood. From the outset the intention was that the plane would have wet wings. But Horten could not find an existing fuel-resistant adhesive, thus the fuel load had to be reduced with the result that the operating radius decreased to 800 km.

This meant, however, that the bomb load could be doubled. This proposal was accepted by the German authorities, provided that the plane could be flight ready in six months!

Since there were no engines available it was decided that the first aircraft would be a glider. There were several good reasons to choose wood as a construction material. At the end of WW2, it was great energy shortage in Germany and the wood was much less energy intensive to produce. Aluminium required more than 3000 kWh, while wood was less than 3 kWh. In addition, the wood was less labuor intensive to process, 200 hours per ton compared to 5,000 hours per ton of dural.

For example, a nose frame was produced by a triangular piece of pine that was glued between two plywood boards. Production time: ten minutes. When the glue had dried the frame were stretched out along a template and in were ready in less than 5 minutes. The entire wing was built in the same simple way.

Rudder Cables, electrical and hydraulic lines were inside the wing spar, a box construction, so that the rest of the wing could be used as a fuel tank when a fuel resistant glue was available.

The adhesive was also supposed to be able to attach to already glued surfaces, in order to simplify production.

The skin plywood on the prototypes were very thick, 17 mm, three times as much as was needed. On the production aircraft it would be replaced by a sandwich material consisting of two 1.5 mm thick plywood boards with a 12 mm spacer material containing of mixed sawdust, charcoal and glue. This material was not only much lighter, it also worked as a Radar Absorbent Material and thereby reducing the radar cross section.

Moreover, the sandwich material should be more resistant to battle damage than a conventional stressed skin structure.

The wings angle of attack varied between nil at the root to minus 3 degrees geometric and 1.5 degrees aerodynamic at the tip, all to give the desired bell shape of the lift distribution over the wing. The elevons were initially of the Frise-type but proved to be inadequate, so blunt nosed rudder was used instead.

Since the aerodynamics were rather unproven, ant no engines were yet available, the first prototypes were built as gliders to test stability and different configurations, mainly of the rudder and elevators.
First flight were on the first of march 1944, but the tow plane, a He 45 were too small, and it could only tow it in ground effect. Five days later an He 111 were assigned as a tower, and it easily towed the plane in to the air. At 12000 ft the pilot, Scheid Hauer, released the cable and made an uneventful flight back to the airstrip. Unfortunately the brake parachute did not deploy at landing, so he retracted the nose gear to stop the airplane. Despite this, the damages to the airplane were small.

The second aircraft were to fly three months later but the engines which would come in March were late. It took several weeks and when the engines finally arrived, they were too big. They had added an extra section to the motor housing, thereby increasing the diameter 60-80 cm without informing Horten.
Since the engine would go through the wing box, where the hole was only 60 cm, it was obvious that it would not work. In addition, they were only six weeks away from the promised first flight.

If one were to maintain the shape of the aircraft Horten would be forced to increase the span from 16 to 21.3 m and the wing area from 42 to 75 m2.
This would make it impossible to achieve the promised performance, although the engine were more powerful than promised. The only possibility left were to modify the basic form.

An additional frame was installed 40 cm outside the original, thus the centre section became 80 cm wider. The outer wing remained unchanged. The new centre section airfoil was 13% thicker than the old one. The greater thickness of the middle section made to the critical Mach number decreased to 0.75, giving a maximum speed of 920 km / h.

The rudder, which consisted of small air brakes on the wings, was supplemented by larger air brakes, which dropped out as soon as the small was fully extended. To save time, several parts were taken from existing aircraft. Nose wheel was the tail wheel from a He 177, They could even use parts of retract mechanism!

Horten worked hard to get the plane ready by the end of the 1944. According to Horten the first flight was around December 18, but the pilot is Lt. Erwin Ziller wrote in his logbook that the first flight was the second February 1945.

It was probably not only his first flight in this airplane, but also his first flight in a jet.

Air Ministry were satisfied with the tests, and ordered Gota Wagonfactory to build 40 aircraft under the designation 8 -229.

H IX V-2 flew probably three or four times before the accident on February 18.

There are many versions of what happened, and they do not have much in common.

The weather was marginal for the test flight and the ground was soft and muddy. But Lt. Ziller started, retracted the landing gear and climbed through the clouds. According to a report one engine stopped, and Ziller diverted against Oranineburg for an emergency landing.
Since it was a low cloud base he made a flat approach to the airfield. The hydraulic pump was on the dead engine, so the landing gear and flaps were extended with the emergency system. This meant that they could not be retracted again.
To maintain the rate of descent, despite the extra drag, Lt. Ziller opened the throttle, but the asymmetrical thrust made the plane yaw. He found that he could not maintain the course, despite giving full rudder. To maintain control of the aircraft he throttled back on the remaining engine and decided to do a minus landing instead. He landed the plane in a field, it slid into a barrier flipped over and crushed the pilot.
The American third army corps took Gota factory April 14. They found the H IX V-3 intact and almost complete. In addition, they found the V-4, V 5 and V-6 in various stages of completion. The ninth armoured corps found H IX V-1 in good condition, near Leipzig.
What happened next to this plane is unknown.
V-3 was shipped later to the U.S.

HE 162

Are we running too fast?

Sometimes you feel like the projects you are working with are too tight on the scedule. But then you just have to see this, the HE-162A, the JSF of the third rich, ment to be the low airplane in the HI-LO mix of ME 262 and HE-162 .



HEINKEL 162A-2
“VOLKSJÄGER”





Schedule:
TTM issued by RLM: 1944-09-08
Specification written: 1944-09-15
Mock up ready: 1944-09-23
Start detail design: 1944-09-23
Start detail manufacturing prototype: 1944-09-24
Heinkel design chosen: 1944-09-30
Ready copy of production drawings: 1944-10-29
Prototype V1 flies: 1944-12-06
Prototype V1 crashes (adhesive failure): 1944-12-10
V2 flies: 1944-12-22
V4 flies: 1945-01-16
V18 flies 1945-01-24
V30 flies: 1945-02-24
1:st division assembled: 1945-02-06
1:st division combat ready: 1945-04-14
50 He 162 combat ready: 1945-05-04
>100 He 162 delivered: 1945-05-08
~800 He 162 in production: 1945-05-08

And it was not the simplest airplane of its time, quite a lot of equipment in it compared to contemporary airplanes (but not the most advanced):
Fuselage: Body and tail: Aluminium.
Wing, rudders and doors: wood
Systems: Ejection seat. Trimable stabilizer, Manual rudders.
Electronic: Radio, DF, IFF, gyro sight.
Armament: 2 x 20 mm gun, 120 rounds/gun.
Engine: BMW 003E-1 920 kp static thrust.
Weights: Equipped exclusive pilot and fuel: 1758 kg.
Take of weight: 2805 kg.
Performance:
Take off to 15 meter: 980 m
Landing distance from 15 meter: 950 m
Climb speed at H=0: 21,5 m/s
Max service altitude: 11700m
Max ferry range: 975 km
Max speed H=0: M=0,73
Max speed H=6km: M=0,79

20101129

So much to blog about, so little time...

Been busy doing all possible things but surfing the net so...
A few things I would like to blog about:
  • Sorry, but the F-35 is Fat and UGLY. But I do admit it have some good sides.
  • F-22, superior or not?
  • PAK-FA, how good is it?
  • Affordable General Aviation.
  • Composites or Aluminium?

Some day, some day....

20100909

A beautiful Lady..

A promotion video for The J-35 Draken (Dragon) from the fifties.



Nostalgia ...

20100907

How can the Gripen supercruise when the F-35 can't?*

The F-35 have in excess of 28000 lbf dry and the Gripen Demo have about 15000 lbf dry.

This makes it look like the F-35 should outrun the Gripen any time, still the official figures does not confirm this. Why?

This is my five cent:
The wing is about the same size, the length of the aircrafts are comparable but when you look at the aircrafts head on something else dawns: the Gripen has a tiny frontal area compared to the F-35 and even that is not the whole truth, since there is a major coke bottle shaping starting behind the canards.
This means that even if the skin friction is comparable and the shape friction is not that much better for the Gripen, the wave drag will be much less.
There are thousands of other details, like the thrust characteristics of the engine, wing thickness, mach cone, weights and stuff, but slenderness is always good when you wants to go fast.



















*Well, I'm pretty sure that the F-35 can supercruise to some extent, but I think it will only be in a limited temperature and altitude envelope.

20100813

Just got to recommend this link...

If you're a airplane nerd like me, this is an exelent link:

http://www.up-ship.com/drawndoc/drawndocair.htm

What do you find when you click on the link?

Airplane cut away drawings and description documents, but not the regular F-16 and so on but more exotic aircrafts like the YF-23, Northrop N-126 Interceptor , Vought V-507, Convair flying submarine report and other airplanes that you hardly have heard of.

Great!

I downloaded a copy of some YF-23 drawings, and printed them in extended A0 format, (that is 0.8 by 3 meters!).

The drawings were not correct to the prototype, but I still think it was worth the $7 that I payed.
Just look at the teaser below...


20100723

A grand day out

Skipped the computer today and did some hands on myself.

A bit cloudy and a tad dirty windscreen, but with a view like this, who can complain?



20100722

First Post

A little blog about Airplanes, flying and other technical things interesting to me is about to be created here.


Don't hold your breath for updates, it might be a long time between posts.


My English is not perfect, far from, but I will do my best to make myself understood.




Let's get started.